Help fix our DemoWe have a problem with the OpenEdit demo. Perhaps you can help? Currently the OpenEdit demo is being used by two different groups of people for two different purposes and they don't seem to work well together. Here's the issue. The demo is also deployed every day and includes the latest changes from the daily CVS build. Throughout the day it is hacked apart as development teams use the demo to run experiments and test bits of code.
We need a solution. I suggest a two pronged approach. First, we need to sort our terminology. I would suggest that what we are calling a demo is in fact NOT a demo. What we have is an online test environment which is open to the public. I suggest we call it something like the OpenEdit Playground. Second, we need to create a proper demo. Characteristics of a demo include:
Over the past year OpenEdit has evolved. Not just the software has grown. The company and surrounding community has grown considerably as well. Our demo has always had this idiosyncrasy but a year or two ago the volume of traffic was much lower.
Thoughts? Posted by Joel Halse Fri, Apr 25 2008 2:33 PM
|
Most Recent Posts
Christopher Burkey to Speak in Santiago, Chile
(0 comments)
Redirect API Change
(0 comments)
OpenEdit Weekly Update
(0 comments)
OpenEdit Updates
(0 comments)
OpenEdit Development 8-14-08
(1 comments)
8 Deployments a Day..
(0 comments)
A List Apart Survey, 2008
(1 comments)
OpenEdit Development 8-10-08
(0 comments)
OpenEdit Development 8-1-08
(0 comments)
New Ideas
(2 comments) Archive
Log in
Syndicate:
|
Copyright 2008 OpenEdit Inc. All rights reserved. last modified: Apr 25 2008

Use OpenEditSites.com to deploy individual demos. We could also recreate this process here again.
A sandbox is a great idea. But it should be subordinate to the demo -- the slick and bulletproof thing that proves how cool the technology is. Sometimes ViewletBuilder or other "read-only" demo technology is used. Not as engaging, but certainly more bulletproof. Use the Flash (SWF) file to show the best face of the technology... then let customers and developers play in individual sandboxes.
Guilty as charged. I went in and broke the blog all to pieces on the demo site while testing some bug fixes the other day. The next day it was fixed of course because the entire "demo" site gets redeployed.
I think the right solution may be to have a second website for "OpenEdit Playground" that you can link to from the demo site or from the home site. You could throw up a warning message letting people know that the playground may or may not work (because people are playing with it). That would allow the demo site to be more or less static in comparison to the playground.
I wonder if you could allow users to create their own playground subsite with their own admin password on the fly from the demo site. That might take more work...
David makes a great point. Let us add a flash demo now then leave the playground since it works almost all the time.
It would be nice - from sales point of view - to have a fully functional demo highlighting features of OpenEdit, so we can show off features to potential clients and a separate playground!
I'll work on creating a flash demo and let you know how it goes.
As Ian points out, we already have a system to deploy individual demos (openeditsites.com) that needs a little polish but works fairly well. Might be worth implementing at some point if that's of interest.